All their recourses had been taken from others. The east and west of the fertile crescent was able to expand. Wherever they went, they transformed human societies. Europeans went and took civilization to america. The man was criticized for being too simple. He thinks people are fundamentally similar. There are huge culture differences but that's not the rout cause. Untimatly the most important is raw materials. Even though they're trying to be more civilized and have more technology, they have a big gap to overcome. It's not the lag of ingenuity, the whole issue was geography.
3.809 million (2010 est.) country comparison to the world: 91 | |
agriculture: 85% industry: NA% services: NA% (2005 est.) | |
1.8% (2004) country comparison to the world: 11 |
total population: 65.99 years country comparison to the world: 162male: 63.78 years female: 68.31 years (2010 est.) | |
3.54 children born/woman (2010 est.) country comparison to the world: 47 | |
1.5% (2007 est.) country comparison to the world: 43 | |
54,000 (2007 est.) country comparison to the world: 63 | |
fewer than 1,000 (2007 est.) country comparison to the world: 75 | |
degree of risk: very high food or waterborne diseases: bacterial diarrhea, hepatitis A, and typhoid fever vectorborne diseases: dengue fever and malaria (2009) |
6,064,515 (July 2010 est.) country comparison to the world: 105 | |
0-14 years: 37.3% (male 1,126,214/female 1,088,211) 15-64 years: 59.3% (male 1,815,731/female 1,704,430) 65 years and over: 3.5% (male 113,285/female 92,904) (2010 est.) | |
total: 21.6 years male: 21.9 years female: 21.3 years (2010 est.) | |
2.033% (2010 est.) country comparison to the world: 51 | |
26.95 births/1,000 population (2010 est.) country comparison to the world: 53 | |
6.62 deaths/1,000 population (July 2010 est.) country comparison to the world: 148 | |
0 migrant(s)/1,000 population country comparison to the world: 112 |
No comments:
Post a Comment